↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Tramadol for osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 tweeters
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Summary Policy documents Twitter Video Dimensions citations
Title
Tramadol for osteoarthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005522.pub2
Pubmed ID
16856101
Authors

M Soledad Cepeda, Francisco Camargo, Carlota Zea, Lina Valencia

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 128 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 7 5%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 26 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,644,311
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,110
of 12,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,500
of 65,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.