↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment for Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Treatment for Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003279.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Keogh, Saam Sedehizadeh, Paul Maddison

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 123 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Other 13 10%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 30 24%
Unknown 36 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 46 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,641,156
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,495
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,386
of 118,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.