Report for: Mechanical methods for induction of labour

Title	Mechanical methods for induction of labour
Published in	Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI	10.1002/14651858.cd001233.pub2
Pubmed ID	22419277
Authors	Marta Jozwiak, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, Anthony J Kelly, Ben Willem J Mol, Olivier Irion, Michel Boulvain

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
France	1	33%
Unknown	2	67%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	3	100%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Unknown	204	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Postgraduate	5	2%
Professor > Associate Professor	3	1%
Student > Bachelor	3	1%
Student > Doctoral Student	3	1%
Student > Master	3	1%
Other	6	3%
Unknown	181	89%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	13	6%
Immunology and Microbiology	2	<1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine	1	<1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology	1	<1%
Nursing and Health Professions	1	<1%
Other	2	<1%
Unknown	184	90%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.

All research outputs

#3,873,500

of 22,757,090 outputs

Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#6,274

of 12,314 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#24,491

of 156,799 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#79

of 182 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mechanical methods for induction of labour

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context