| Title |
Mechanical methods for induction of labour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001233.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marta Jozwiak, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, Anthony J Kelly, Ben Willem J Mol, Olivier Irion, Michel Boulvain |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 204 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 2% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 2% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 1% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 1% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 180 | 88% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | <1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | <1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 183 | 90% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,055,967
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,829
of 13,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,054
of 161,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#74
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.