The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Targeted therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006017.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chris Coppin, Lyly Le, Timothy J Wilt, Christian Kollmannsberger |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 221 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 12% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 18% |
| Unknown | 68 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 80 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2010.
All research outputs
#9,009,820
of 26,545,486 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,817
of 13,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,845
of 95,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,545,486 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.