↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Thermal insulation for preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Thermal insulation for preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009908.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phil Alderson, Gillian Campbell, Andrew F Smith, Sheryl Warttig, Amanda Nicholson, Sharon R Lewis

Abstract

Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia occurs because of interference with normal temperature regulation by anaesthetic drugs and exposure of skin for prolonged periods. A number of different interventions have been proposed to maintain body temperature by reducing heat loss. Thermal insulation, such as extra layers of insulating material or reflective blankets, should reduce heat loss through convection and radiation and potentially help avoid hypothermia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Unknown 146 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 22%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 32 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,234,614
of 17,468,018 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,200
of 11,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,541
of 197,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,468,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.