↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychosocial interventions for erectile dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Psychosocial interventions for erectile dysfunction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004825.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamara Melnik, Bernardo Soares, Antônia Gladys Nasello

Abstract

Normal sexual function is a biopsychosocial process and relies on the coordination of psychological, endocrine, vascular, and neurological factors. Recent data show that psychological factors are involved in a substantial number of cases of erectile dysfunction (ED) alone or in combination with organic causes. However, in contrast to the advances in somatic research of erectile dysfunction, scientific literature shows contradictory reports on the results of psychotherapy for the treatment of ED.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 165 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 52 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 33%
Psychology 21 12%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 56 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,299,208
of 25,383,225 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,815
of 12,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,260
of 76,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.