↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intrapartum antibiotics for known maternal Group B streptococcal colonization

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
119 tweeters
facebook
294 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
Title
Intrapartum antibiotics for known maternal Group B streptococcal colonization
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007467.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arne Ohlsson, Vibhuti S Shah

Abstract

Maternal colonization with group B streptococcus (GBS) during pregnancy increases the risk of neonatal infection by vertical transmission. Administration of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) during labor has been associated with a reduction in early onset GBS disease (EOGBSD). However, treating all colonized women during labor exposes a large number of women and infants to possible adverse effects without benefit.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 367 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 62 16%
Student > Master 56 15%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 9%
Student > Postgraduate 22 6%
Other 82 22%
Unknown 78 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 153 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 3%
Other 38 10%
Unknown 92 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 224. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#128,574
of 21,828,043 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#225
of 12,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,121
of 206,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,828,043 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.