↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dietary interventions (plant sterols, stanols, omega-3 fatty acids, soy protein and dietary fibers) for familial hypercholesterolaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
Title
Dietary interventions (plant sterols, stanols, omega-3 fatty acids, soy protein and dietary fibers) for familial hypercholesterolaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001918.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anita Malhotra, Nusrat Shafiq, Anjuman Arora, Meenu Singh, Rajendra Kumar, Samir Malhotra

Abstract

A cholesterol-lowering diet and several other dietary interventions have been suggested as a management approach either independently or as an adjuvant to drug therapy in children and adults with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). However, a consensus has yet to be reached on the most appropriate dietary treatment. Plant sterols are commonly used in FH although patients may know them by other names like phytosterols or stanols.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 242 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 17%
Student > Master 33 13%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Other 43 17%
Unknown 57 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 4%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 74 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,123,749
of 21,343,339 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,659
of 12,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,330
of 205,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,343,339 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.