↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during anaesthesia for prevention of mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during anaesthesia for prevention of mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007922.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabiano T Barbosa, Aldemar A Castro, Célio F de Sousa-Rodrigues

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 157 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 40 25%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 30 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2016.
All research outputs
#6,836,773
of 13,207,331 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,777
of 10,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,953
of 189,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#151
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,207,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.