The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) during anaesthesia for prevention of mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007922.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fabiano T Barbosa, Aldemar A Castro, Célio F de Sousa‐Rodrigues |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 210 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 32 | 15% |
Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
Other | 49 | 23% |
Unknown | 52 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 49% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
Other | 18 | 8% |
Unknown | 57 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2016.
All research outputs
#6,606,561
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,102
of 13,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,503
of 245,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#141
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.