↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abdominal drainage versus no drainage post gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Abdominal drainage versus no drainage post gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008788.pub2
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Gastrectomy remains the primary therapeutic method for resectable gastric cancer. Thought of as an important measure to reduce post-operative complications and mortality, abdominal drainage was used widely after gastrectomy for gastric cancer in previous decades. The benefits of abdominal drainage have been questioned by researchers in recent years.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 9 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2011.
All research outputs
#18,295,723
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,412
of 12,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,880
of 180,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.