↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Yoga in addition to standard care for patients with haematological malignancies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
396 Mendeley
Title
Yoga in addition to standard care for patients with haematological malignancies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010146.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen Felbel, Joerg J Meerpohl, Ina Monsef, Andreas Engert, Nicole Skoetz

Abstract

Haematological malignancies are malignant neoplasms of the myeloid or lymphatic cell lines including leukaemia, lymphoma and myeloma. In order to manage physical and psychological aspects of the disease and its treatment, complementary therapies like yoga are coming increasingly into focus. However, the effectiveness of yoga practice for people suffering from haematological malignancies remains unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 392 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 11%
Student > Bachelor 45 11%
Researcher 38 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 64 16%
Unknown 118 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 15%
Psychology 35 9%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 60 15%
Unknown 129 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,788,153
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,480
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,005
of 244,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.