↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Yoga in addition to standard care for patients with haematological malignancies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
397 Mendeley
Title
Yoga in addition to standard care for patients with haematological malignancies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010146.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen Felbel, Joerg J Meerpohl, Ina Monsef, Andreas Engert, Nicole Skoetz

Abstract

Haematological malignancies are malignant neoplasms of the myeloid or lymphatic cell lines including leukaemia, lymphoma and myeloma. In order to manage physical and psychological aspects of the disease and its treatment, complementary therapies like yoga are coming increasingly into focus. However, the effectiveness of yoga practice for people suffering from haematological malignancies remains unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 397 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 393 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 11%
Student > Bachelor 45 11%
Researcher 38 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 62 16%
Unknown 120 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 15%
Psychology 34 9%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 61 15%
Unknown 132 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,400,127
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,113
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,252
of 244,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#114
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.