↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Yoga in addition to standard care for patients with haematological malignancies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
361 Mendeley
Title
Yoga in addition to standard care for patients with haematological malignancies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010146.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen Felbel, Joerg J Meerpohl, Ina Monsef, Andreas Engert, Nicole Skoetz

Abstract

Haematological malignancies are malignant neoplasms of the myeloid or lymphatic cell lines including leukaemia, lymphoma and myeloma. In order to manage physical and psychological aspects of the disease and its treatment, complementary therapies like yoga are coming increasingly into focus. However, the effectiveness of yoga practice for people suffering from haematological malignancies remains unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 357 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 16%
Student > Bachelor 43 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 12%
Researcher 34 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 63 17%
Unknown 99 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 16%
Psychology 33 9%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 63 17%
Unknown 108 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,228,618
of 23,573,357 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,820
of 12,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,089
of 230,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,573,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.