↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Yoga in addition to standard care for patients with haematological malignancies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
Title
Yoga in addition to standard care for patients with haematological malignancies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010146.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen Felbel, Joerg J Meerpohl, Ina Monsef, Andreas Engert, Nicole Skoetz

Abstract

Haematological malignancies are malignant neoplasms of the myeloid or lymphatic cell lines including leukaemia, lymphoma and myeloma. In order to manage physical and psychological aspects of the disease and its treatment, complementary therapies like yoga are coming increasingly into focus. However, the effectiveness of yoga practice for people suffering from haematological malignancies remains unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 276 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 14%
Student > Bachelor 37 13%
Researcher 33 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Other 49 17%
Unknown 53 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 16%
Psychology 30 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Other 53 19%
Unknown 63 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,478,514
of 17,714,352 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,184
of 11,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,647
of 161,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#99
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,714,352 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.