↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vitamins C and E for asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
Title
Vitamins C and E for asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010749.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Wilkinson, Anna Hart, Stephen J Milan, Karnam Sugumar

Abstract

The association between dietary antioxidants and asthma or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is not fully understood. Vitamin C and vitamin E are natural antioxidants that are predominantly present in fruits and vegetables; inadequate vitamin E intake is associated with airway inflammation. It has been postulated that the combination may be more beneficial than either single antioxidant for people with asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 213 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 18%
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 12%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 48 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 13%
Sports and Recreations 13 6%
Psychology 11 5%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 62 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,222,796
of 15,971,647 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,759
of 11,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,991
of 191,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,971,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.