↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physiotherapy for Parkinson's disease: a comparison of techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1044 Mendeley
Title
Physiotherapy for Parkinson's disease: a comparison of techniques
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002815.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire L Tomlinson, Clare P Herd, Carl E Clarke, Charmaine Meek, Smitaa Patel, Rebecca Stowe, Katherine HO Deane, Laila Shah, Catherine M Sackley, Keith Wheatley, Natalie Ives

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,044 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 1025 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 167 16%
Student > Master 145 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 8%
Researcher 79 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 62 6%
Other 186 18%
Unknown 324 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 254 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 192 18%
Neuroscience 43 4%
Psychology 35 3%
Sports and Recreations 33 3%
Other 133 13%
Unknown 354 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,850,159
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,169
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,445
of 243,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#160
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.