↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Rapid tests for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in patients with suspected disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
Title
Rapid tests for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in patients with suspected disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009135.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marleen Boelaert, Kristien Verdonck, Joris Menten, Temmy Sunyoto, Johan van Griensven, Francois Chappuis, Suman Rijal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 238 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 17%
Researcher 42 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 43 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 5%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 62 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#413,941
of 18,057,469 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#896
of 11,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,818
of 196,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,057,469 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.