The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Family intervention for schizophrenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000088.pub3 |
| Authors |
Fiona Pharoah, Jair J Mari, John Rathbone, Winson Wong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Croatia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 25% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 462 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 452 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 75 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 33 | 7% |
| Researcher | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 104 | 23% |
| Unknown | 117 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 102 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 62 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 8% |
| Unknown | 127 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,472,219
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,015
of 13,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,204
of 193,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.