↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Promoting patient uptake and adherence in cardiac rehabilitation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
462 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Promoting patient uptake and adherence in cardiac rehabilitation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007131.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kunal N Karmali, Philippa Davies, Fiona Taylor, Andrew Beswick, Nicole Martin, Shah Ebrahim

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 462 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 453 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 90 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 15%
Student > Bachelor 62 13%
Researcher 42 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 8%
Other 96 21%
Unknown 66 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 140 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 20%
Psychology 52 11%
Social Sciences 23 5%
Sports and Recreations 19 4%
Other 51 11%
Unknown 86 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,285,220
of 14,626,074 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,624
of 11,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,450
of 186,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,626,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.