The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Maintenance treatments for opiate ‐dependent adolescents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007210.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silvia Minozzi, Laura Amato, Cristina Bellisario, Marina Davoli |
| Abstract |
The scientific literature examining effective treatments for opioid-dependent adults clearly indicates that pharmacotherapy is a necessary and acceptable component. Nevertheless, no reviews have been published that systematically assess the effectiveness of pharmacological maintenance treatment in adolescents. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 290 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 11% |
| Researcher | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 57 | 20% |
| Unknown | 89 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 30% |
| Psychology | 30 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Unknown | 107 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,995,296
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,082
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,970
of 244,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.