↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Feedback or biofeedback to augment pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
404 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Feedback or biofeedback to augment pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009252
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roselien Herderschee, E. Jean C. Hay-Smith, G Peter Herbison, Jan Paul Roovers, Maas Jan Heineman

Abstract

Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is an effective treatment for stress urinary incontinence in women. Whilst most of the PFMT trials have been done in women with stress urinary incontinence, there is also some trial evidence that PFMT is effective for urgency urinary incontinence and mixed urinary incontinence. Feedback or biofeedback are common adjuncts used along with PFMT to help teach a voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction or to improve training performance.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 399 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 16%
Student > Bachelor 56 14%
Researcher 46 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 10%
Other 39 10%
Other 90 22%
Unknown 70 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 154 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 5%
Psychology 17 4%
Social Sciences 14 3%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 81 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,128,359
of 18,203,597 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,861
of 11,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,427
of 196,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,203,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.