| Title |
Central action beta‐blockers versus placebo for neuroleptic‐induced acute akathisia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001946.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A R Lima, J Bacalcthuk, T R E Barnes, K Soares-Weiser |
| Abstract |
Neuroleptic-induced akathisia is a common, distressing early-onset adverse effect of neuroleptic drugs. It has been associated with poor treatment compliance and an increased risk of relapse. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 45% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 24% |
| Unknown | 32 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 24% |
| Psychology | 9 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 41 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,321,996
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,961
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,003
of 75,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.