↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Central action beta‐blockers versus placebo for neuroleptic‐induced acute akathisia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Central action beta‐blockers versus placebo for neuroleptic‐induced acute akathisia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001946.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

A R Lima, J Bacalcthuk, T R E Barnes, K Soares-Weiser

Abstract

Neuroleptic-induced akathisia is a common, distressing early-onset adverse effect of neuroleptic drugs. It has been associated with poor treatment compliance and an increased risk of relapse.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 25 24%
Unknown 32 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 23%
Psychology 9 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 41 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,321,996
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,961
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,003
of 75,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.