↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001298.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gaity Ahmad, Fiona L Mackie, David A Iles, Helena O'Flynn, Sofia Dias, Mostafa Metwally, Andrew Watson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 154 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 19%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Other 11 7%
Other 35 22%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Psychology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 35 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2014.
All research outputs
#16,194,194
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,239
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,668
of 240,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#201
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.