↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physician anaesthetists versus non-physician providers of anaesthesia for surgical patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
Title
Physician anaesthetists versus non-physician providers of anaesthesia for surgical patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010357.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon R Lewis, Amanda Nicholson, Andrew F Smith, Phil Alderson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 269 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 14%
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 55 20%
Unknown 63 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 18%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Psychology 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 77 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2022.
All research outputs
#263,093
of 22,053,897 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#454
of 12,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,382
of 203,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,053,897 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.