↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physician anaesthetists versus non-physician providers of anaesthesia for surgical patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
Title
Physician anaesthetists versus non-physician providers of anaesthesia for surgical patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010357.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon R Lewis, Amanda Nicholson, Andrew F Smith, Phil Alderson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 231 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 16%
Researcher 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Other 19 8%
Other 50 22%
Unknown 46 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 19%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Psychology 11 5%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 59 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#219,860
of 19,191,572 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#410
of 11,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,257
of 198,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,191,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.