The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008451.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony Scott, Peter Sivey, Driss Ait Ouakrim, Lisa Willenberg, Lucio Naccarella, John Furler, Doris Young |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 23% |
| United States | 7 | 9% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Thailand | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 41 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 59% |
| Scientists | 15 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | <1% |
| United States | 7 | <1% |
| Australia | 5 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1062 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 188 | 17% |
| Researcher | 187 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 132 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 75 | 7% |
| Other | 69 | 6% |
| Other | 221 | 20% |
| Unknown | 230 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 389 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 108 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 80 | 7% |
| Psychology | 62 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 53 | 5% |
| Other | 143 | 13% |
| Unknown | 267 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2024.
All research outputs
#334,316
of 26,250,639 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#546
of 13,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,134
of 139,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,250,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.