↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Delivery arrangements for health systems in low‐income countries: an overview of systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1574 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Delivery arrangements for health systems in low‐income countries: an overview of systematic reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011083.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agustín Ciapponi, Simon Lewin, Cristian A Herrera, Newton Opiyo, Tomas Pantoja, Elizabeth Paulsen, Gabriel Rada, Charles S Wiysonge, Gabriel Bastías, Lilian Dudley, Signe Flottorp, Marie‐Pierre Gagnon, Sebastian Garcia Marti, Claire Glenton, Charles I Okwundu, Blanca Peñaloza, Fatima Suleman, Andrew D Oxman

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,574 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1574 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 256 16%
Researcher 165 10%
Student > Bachelor 140 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 128 8%
Other 76 5%
Other 249 16%
Unknown 560 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 362 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 222 14%
Social Sciences 78 5%
Psychology 74 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 2%
Other 188 12%
Unknown 623 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,272,983
of 26,673,263 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,849
of 13,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,785
of 328,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,673,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.