Report for: Exercise for intermittent claudication

Title	Exercise for intermittent claudication
Published in	Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI	10.1002/14651858.cd000990.pub3
Pubmed ID	25037027
Authors	Risha Lane, Brian Ellis, Lorna Watson, Gillian C Leng
Abstract	Exercise programmes are a relatively inexpensive, low-risk option compared with other more invasive therapies for leg pain on walking (intermittent claudication (IC)). This is an update of a review first published in 1998.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United Kingdom	6	29%
Spain	3	14%
Japan	1	5%
United States	1	5%
Canada	1	5%
Unknown	9	43%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	16	76%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	5	24%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United Kingdom	3	1%
Czechia	1	<1%
Brazil	1	<1%
Spain	1	<1%
United States	1	<1%
Unknown	293	98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Master	48	16%
Student > Ph. D. Student	38	13%
Student > Bachelor	38	13%
Researcher	35	12%
Student > Doctoral Student	22	7%
Other	55	18%
Unknown	64	21%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	131	44%
Nursing and Health Professions	30	10%
Sports and Recreations	17	6%
Psychology	13	4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	12	4%
Other	22	7%
Unknown	75	25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.

All research outputs

#1,274,935

of 22,758,963 outputs

Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#2,940

of 12,314 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#13,792

of 228,762 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#54

of 235 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise for intermittent claudication

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context