↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Water‐based exercise for adults with asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
Title
Water‐based exercise for adults with asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010456.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Jose Grande, Valter Silva, Brenda NG Andriolo, Rachel Riera, Sergio A Parra, Maria S Peccin

Abstract

Asthma is a common condition characterised by airway inflammation and airway narrowing, which can result in intermittent symptoms of wheezing, coughing and chest tightness, possibly limiting activities of daily life. Water-based exercise is believed to offer benefits for people with asthma through pollen-free air, humidity and effects of exercise on physical function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 322 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 15%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 9%
Other 22 7%
Researcher 21 6%
Other 49 15%
Unknown 120 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 14%
Sports and Recreations 18 5%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Other 32 10%
Unknown 135 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2016.
All research outputs
#14,878,424
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,662
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,126
of 228,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#185
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.