↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tiotropium versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
Title
Tiotropium versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009285.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotta Karner, Jimmy Chong, Phillippa Poole

Abstract

Tiotropium is an anticholinergic agent which has gained widespread acceptance as a once daily maintenance therapy for symptoms and exacerbations of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In the past few years there have been several systematic reviews of the efficacy of tiotropium, however, several new trials have compared tiotropium treatment with placebo, including those of a soft mist inhaler, making an update necessary.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 226 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 16%
Researcher 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 12%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 41 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 6%
Psychology 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 49 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,507,770
of 18,110,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,721
of 11,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,324
of 201,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,110,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.