The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Topical lidocaine for neuropathic pain in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010958.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheena Derry, Philip J Wiffen, R Andrew Moore, Jane Quinlan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 48 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 16% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 350 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 63 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 9% |
| Researcher | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 61 | 17% |
| Unknown | 111 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 123 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 4% |
| Psychology | 14 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 11% |
| Unknown | 126 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#569,647
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#938
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,932
of 240,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.