↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
42 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
452 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003815.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Esposito, Yasmin Ardebili, Helen V Worthington

Abstract

Dental implants are available in different materials, shapes and with different surface characteristics. In particular, numerous implant designs and surface modifications have been developed for improving clinical outcome. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2002, and previously updated in 2003, 2005 and 2007.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 440 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 107 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 12%
Student > Bachelor 44 10%
Student > Postgraduate 43 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 8%
Other 98 22%
Unknown 69 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 284 63%
Engineering 13 3%
Materials Science 12 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 2%
Other 32 7%
Unknown 88 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2019.
All research outputs
#608,971
of 18,891,791 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,414
of 11,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,311
of 203,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,891,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.