| Title |
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003815.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marco Esposito, Yasmin Ardebili, Helen V Worthington |
| Abstract |
Dental implants are available in different materials, shapes and with different surface characteristics. In particular, numerous implant designs and surface modifications have been developed for improving clinical outcome. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2002, and previously updated in 2003, 2005 and 2007. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 15% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 13% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 21% |
| Scientists | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 468 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 459 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 106 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 43 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 42 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 9% |
| Other | 93 | 20% |
| Unknown | 92 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 281 | 60% |
| Engineering | 14 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 11 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 6% |
| Unknown | 111 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#930,610
of 24,764,450 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,901
of 12,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,067
of 233,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,764,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.