↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topotecan for ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Topotecan for ovarian cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005589.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Minawaer Abudou, Dake Zhong, Taixiang Wu, XiaoKe Wu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 138 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Researcher 15 11%
Professor 5 4%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 38 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Chemistry 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 43 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,515,245
of 25,387,480 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,605
of 12,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,485
of 81,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.