↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topotecan for ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Topotecan for ovarian cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005589.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Minawaer Abudou, Dake Zhong, Taixiang Wu, XiaoKe Wu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 145 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Researcher 16 11%
Professor 5 3%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 41 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Chemistry 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 46 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,127
of 84,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.