| Title |
Interventions for treating femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009076.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vrisha Madhuri, Vivek Dutt, Abhay D Gahukamble, Prathap Tharyan |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Peru | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Andorra | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 285 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 8% |
| Researcher | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 17% |
| Unknown | 80 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 93 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,093,375
of 23,848,132 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,584
of 12,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,406
of 232,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,848,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.