↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Structural and community-level interventions for increasing condom use to prevent the transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
393 Mendeley
Title
Structural and community-level interventions for increasing condom use to prevent the transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003363.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralfh Moreno, Herfina Y Nababan, Erika Ota, Windy MV Wariki, Satoshi Ezoe, Stuart Gilmour, Kenji Shibuya

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 393 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 389 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 13%
Researcher 50 13%
Student > Bachelor 46 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 71 18%
Unknown 55 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 17%
Social Sciences 61 16%
Psychology 21 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 73 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2016.
All research outputs
#1,577,835
of 17,053,340 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,975
of 11,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,129
of 198,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,053,340 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.