↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Structural and community-level interventions for increasing condom use to prevent the transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
465 Mendeley
Title
Structural and community-level interventions for increasing condom use to prevent the transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003363.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralfh Moreno, Herfina Y Nababan, Erika Ota, Windy MV Wariki, Satoshi Ezoe, Stuart Gilmour, Kenji Shibuya

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 465 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 461 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 104 22%
Researcher 53 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 11%
Student > Bachelor 50 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 5%
Other 93 20%
Unknown 88 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 75 16%
Social Sciences 64 14%
Psychology 26 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 2%
Other 55 12%
Unknown 110 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#647,986
of 23,505,064 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,296
of 12,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,561
of 230,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.