| Title |
Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use to prevent the transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003363.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ralfh Moreno, Herfina Y Nababan, Erika Ota, Windy MV Wariki, Satoshi Ezoe, Stuart Gilmour, Kenji Shibuya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 32% |
| Finland | 2 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
| Scientists | 4 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 490 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 107 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 11% |
| Researcher | 52 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 86 | 17% |
| Unknown | 116 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 130 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 77 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 65 | 13% |
| Psychology | 23 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 48 | 10% |
| Unknown | 140 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#727,715
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,359
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,811
of 239,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.