↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined hormonal contraceptives for contraception

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
Title
Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined hormonal contraceptives for contraception
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004695.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison Edelman, Elizabeth Micks, Maria F Gallo, Jeffrey T Jensen, David A Grimes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
Peru 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 282 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 11%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 10%
Other 18 6%
Other 67 23%
Unknown 80 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 7%
Psychology 17 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 5%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 86 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 280. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#106,131
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#186
of 12,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#904
of 229,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.