↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during the postoperative period for prevention of postoperative morbidity and mortality following major abdominal surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
361 Mendeley
Title
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during the postoperative period for prevention of postoperative morbidity and mortality following major abdominal surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008930.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire J Ireland, Timothy M Chapman, Suneeth F Mathew, G Peter Herbison, Mathew Zacharias

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 357 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 16%
Student > Bachelor 44 12%
Researcher 43 12%
Other 33 9%
Student > Postgraduate 27 7%
Other 63 17%
Unknown 93 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 148 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 14%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Psychology 9 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 26 7%
Unknown 109 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2017.
All research outputs
#4,154,217
of 21,338,015 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,570
of 12,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,787
of 208,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#130
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,338,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.