↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low- and middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
326 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Summary Policy documents Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low- and middle-income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006413.pub2
Pubmed ID
21901704
Authors

Xavier Bosch-Capblanch, Sajil Liaqat, Paul Garner

Abstract

Primary healthcare (PHC) workers often work alone or in isolation. Healthcare managerial supervision is recommended to help assure quality; but this requires skilled supervisors and takes time and resources. It is therefore important to assess to what extent supervision is beneficial and the ways in which it can be implemented.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 313 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 21%
Researcher 50 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 7%
Student > Postgraduate 21 6%
Other 71 22%
Unknown 53 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 17%
Social Sciences 42 13%
Psychology 9 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 3%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 65 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,906,939
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,546
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,918
of 125,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.