↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low- and middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low- and middle-income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006413.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xavier Bosch-Capblanch, Sajil Liaqat, Paul Garner

Abstract

Primary healthcare (PHC) workers often work alone or in isolation. Healthcare managerial supervision is recommended to help assure quality; but this requires skilled supervisors and takes time and resources. It is therefore important to assess to what extent supervision is beneficial and the ways in which it can be implemented.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 267 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 22%
Researcher 49 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Student > Postgraduate 20 7%
Other 58 21%
Unknown 31 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 18%
Social Sciences 42 15%
Psychology 9 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 3%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 42 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,230,345
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,716
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,608
of 103,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.