↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fluphenazine versus low-potency first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Fluphenazine versus low-potency first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009230.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdolna Tardy, Maximilian Huhn, Rolf R Engel, Stefan Leucht

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 22%
Student > Bachelor 14 18%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 30%
Psychology 12 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 19 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,852,201
of 19,372,190 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,318
of 11,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,423
of 204,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,372,190 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.