↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fluphenazine versus low-potency first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 tweeters
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Fluphenazine versus low-potency first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009230.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdolna Tardy, Maximilian Huhn, Rolf R Engel, Stefan Leucht

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 99 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Unspecified 12 12%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 25%
Unspecified 12 12%
Psychology 12 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 28 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,546,503
of 23,914,787 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,518
of 12,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,145
of 232,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,914,787 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.