| Title |
Closure versus non‐closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short‐ and long‐term outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000163.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony A Bamigboye, G Justus Hofmeyr |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 276 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 11% |
| Researcher | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 9% |
| Other | 53 | 19% |
| Unknown | 78 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 10% |
| Psychology | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Unknown | 86 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,176,823
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,459
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,016
of 242,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#119
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.