↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
Title
Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000163.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony A Bamigboye, G Justus Hofmeyr

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 258 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 13%
Student > Master 32 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 11%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Postgraduate 24 9%
Other 66 25%
Unknown 55 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 10%
Unspecified 17 6%
Psychology 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 60 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,191,042
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,857
of 12,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,503
of 231,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#112
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.