↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hypnosis for induction of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Hypnosis for induction of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010852.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daisuke Nishi, Miyako N Shirakawa, Erika Ota, Nobutsugu Hanada, Rintaro Mori

Abstract

Induction of labour using pharmacological and mechanical methods can increase complications. Complementary and alternative medicine methods including hypnosis may have the potential to provide a safe alternative option for the induction of labour. However, the effectiveness of hypnosis for inducing labour has not yet been fully evaluated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 176 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Other 10 6%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 62 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Psychology 15 9%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 68 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,807,229
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,462
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,829
of 243,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#98
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.