↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Meditation therapies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
601 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Meditation therapies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006507.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thawatchai Krisanaprakornkit, Chetta Ngamjarus, Chartree Witoonchart, Nawanant Piyavhatkul

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common developmental disorders experienced in childhood and can persist into adulthood. The disorder has early onset and is characterized by a combination of overactive, poorly modulated behavior with marked inattention. In the long term it can impair academic performance, vocational success and social-emotional development. Meditation is increasingly used for psychological conditions and could be used as a tool for attentional training in the ADHD population.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 601 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 588 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 113 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 12%
Student > Bachelor 63 10%
Researcher 59 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 7%
Other 119 20%
Unknown 128 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 137 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 125 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 10%
Social Sciences 36 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 3%
Other 77 13%
Unknown 149 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,202,325
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,625
of 12,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,169
of 86,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.