↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antioxidants for pain in chronic pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Antioxidants for pain in chronic pancreatitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008945.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Usama Ahmed Ali, Sjoerd Jens, Olivier RC Busch, Frederik Keus, Harry van Goor, Hein G Gooszen, Marja A Boermeester

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 171 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 25%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 13 8%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 30 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 16%
Psychology 8 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 36 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,841,781
of 17,175,498 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,424
of 11,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,437
of 206,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,175,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.