| Title |
Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006657.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bianca Pluess, Frank C Tanser, Christian Lengeler, Brian L Sharp |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 597 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Burkina Faso | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 581 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 113 | 19% |
| Researcher | 99 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 74 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 97 | 16% |
| Unknown | 109 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 144 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 107 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 5% |
| Other | 97 | 16% |
| Unknown | 128 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,868,523
of 23,746,606 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,177
of 12,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,741
of 97,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,746,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.