↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Advanced training in trauma life support for ambulance crews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
27 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
Advanced training in trauma life support for ambulance crews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003109.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sudha Jayaraman, Dinesh Sethi, Roger Wong

Abstract

There is an increasing global burden of injury especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To address this, models of trauma care initially developed in high income countries are being adopted in LMIC settings. In particular, ambulance crews with advanced life support (ALS) training are being promoted in LMICs as a strategy for improving outcomes for victims of trauma. However, there is controversy as to the effectiveness of this health service intervention and the evidence has yet to be rigorously appraised.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 174 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 20%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 33 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 13%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Psychology 7 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 3%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 41 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#933,464
of 16,663,134 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,516
of 11,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,774
of 203,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,663,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.