↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006714.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia A. Lohr, Jennifer L Hayes, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Master 23 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 31 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Psychology 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 38 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,301,094
of 21,398,533 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,068
of 12,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,486
of 214,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,398,533 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.