↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006714.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia A. Lohr, Jennifer L Hayes, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Psychology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 30 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,049,201
of 17,525,923 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,723
of 11,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,721
of 207,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,525,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.