The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Advanced trauma life support training for hospital staff
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004173.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sudha Jayaraman, Dinesh Sethi, Paul Chinnock, Roger Wong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Denmark | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 40% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Kazakhstan | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 12% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 53 | 22% |
| Unknown | 67 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 11% |
| Psychology | 11 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Unknown | 78 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,093,898
of 26,139,724 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,076
of 13,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,600
of 249,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,139,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.