↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Advanced trauma life support training for hospital staff

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
46 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
Advanced trauma life support training for hospital staff
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004173.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sudha Jayaraman, Dinesh Sethi, Paul Chinnock, Roger Wong

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 163 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Student > Master 25 15%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 9%
Other 40 23%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 34 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2020.
All research outputs
#650,273
of 18,623,929 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,545
of 11,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,125
of 209,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,623,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.