The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical and surgical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008201.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan R Kahn, David R Morrison, Jacqueline M Cohen, Jessica Emed, Vicky Tagalakis, Andre Roussin, William Geerts |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 224 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
| Other | 62 | 27% |
| Unknown | 26 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 111 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2014.
All research outputs
#4,399,108
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,708
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,419
of 208,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#152
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.