↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Manual therapy and exercise for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
99 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
768 Mendeley
Title
Manual therapy and exercise for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011275
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew J Page, Sally Green, Sharon Kramer, Renea V Johnston, Brodwen McBain, Marisa Chau, Rachelle Buchbinder

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 99 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 768 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 753 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 167 22%
Student > Bachelor 157 20%
Other 68 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 63 8%
Student > Postgraduate 53 7%
Other 140 18%
Unknown 120 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 313 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 194 25%
Sports and Recreations 32 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 2%
Social Sciences 11 1%
Other 53 7%
Unknown 146 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2020.
All research outputs
#260,900
of 17,648,139 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#534
of 11,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,147
of 207,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,648,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.