↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Efficacy and experiences of telephone counselling for informal carers of people with dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
25 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
436 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and experiences of telephone counselling for informal carers of people with dementia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009126.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabine Lins, Daniela Hayder-Beichel, Gerta Rücker, Edith Motschall, Gerd Antes, Gabriele Meyer, Gero Langer

Abstract

Informal carers of people with dementia can suffer from depressive symptoms, emotional distress and other physiological, social and financial consequences.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 428 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 16%
Researcher 61 14%
Student > Bachelor 49 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 6%
Other 60 14%
Unknown 89 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 72 17%
Psychology 68 16%
Social Sciences 46 11%
Computer Science 6 1%
Other 46 11%
Unknown 105 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2020.
All research outputs
#724,944
of 17,795,994 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,803
of 11,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,430
of 208,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,795,994 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.