↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Efficacy and experiences of telephone counselling for informal carers of people with dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
24 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
588 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and experiences of telephone counselling for informal carers of people with dementia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009126.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabine Lins, Daniela Hayder‐Beichel, Gerta Rücker, Edith Motschall, Gerd Antes, Gabriele Meyer, Gero Langer

Abstract

Informal carers of people with dementia can suffer from depressive symptoms, emotional distress and other physiological, social and financial consequences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 588 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 580 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 91 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 14%
Researcher 62 11%
Student > Bachelor 56 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 5%
Other 97 16%
Unknown 171 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 85 14%
Psychology 78 13%
Social Sciences 47 8%
Unspecified 18 3%
Other 62 11%
Unknown 189 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,321,317
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,812
of 11,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,448
of 248,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.