↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Efficacy and experiences of telephone counselling for informal carers of people with dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
25 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
523 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and experiences of telephone counselling for informal carers of people with dementia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009126.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabine Lins, Daniela Hayder-Beichel, Gerta Rücker, Edith Motschall, Gerd Antes, Gabriele Meyer, Gero Langer

Abstract

Informal carers of people with dementia can suffer from depressive symptoms, emotional distress and other physiological, social and financial consequences.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 523 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 515 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 88 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 15%
Researcher 62 12%
Student > Bachelor 55 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 6%
Other 82 16%
Unknown 130 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 84 16%
Psychology 74 14%
Social Sciences 45 9%
Unspecified 15 3%
Other 57 11%
Unknown 146 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,029,351
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,303
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,428
of 237,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.