| Title |
Efficacy and experiences of telephone counselling for informal carers of people with dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009126.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabine Lins, Daniela Hayder‐Beichel, Gerta Rücker, Edith Motschall, Gerd Antes, Gabriele Meyer, Gero Langer |
| Abstract |
Informal carers of people with dementia can suffer from depressive symptoms, emotional distress and other physiological, social and financial consequences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 30% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 22% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 579 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 571 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 92 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 80 | 14% |
| Researcher | 61 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 5% |
| Other | 83 | 14% |
| Unknown | 178 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 84 | 15% |
| Psychology | 77 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 47 | 8% |
| Engineering | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 58 | 10% |
| Unknown | 195 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,361,579
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,887
of 13,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,708
of 249,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.