↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008602.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly Gray, Verity Pacey, Paul Gibbons, David Little, Joshua Burns

Abstract

Congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV), which is also known as clubfoot, is a common congenital orthopaedic condition characterised by an excessively turned in foot (equinovarus) and high medial longitudinal arch (cavus). If left untreated it can result in long-term disability, deformity and pain. Interventions can be conservative (such as splinting or stretching) or surgical. The review was first published in 2012 and we reviewed new searches in 2013 (update published 2014).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 145 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 23%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Researcher 10 7%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 30 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 35 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2017.
All research outputs
#5,492,465
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,330
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,559
of 231,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.