The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community‐dwelling populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011479.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eileen FS Kaner, Fiona R Beyer, Claire Garnett, David Crane, Jamie Brown, Colin Muirhead, James Redmore, Amy O'Donnell, James J Newham, Frank de Vocht, Matthew Hickman, Heather Brown, Gregory Maniatopoulos, Susan Michie |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 20% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 54 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 59% |
| Scientists | 19 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 693 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 692 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 95 | 14% |
| Researcher | 88 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 76 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 11% |
| Other | 36 | 5% |
| Other | 105 | 15% |
| Unknown | 218 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 129 | 19% |
| Psychology | 97 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 74 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 47 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 79 | 11% |
| Unknown | 252 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#327,374
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#535
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,576
of 332,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.