↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
44 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
78 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
325 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
778 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000963.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven J Kamper, Andreas T Apeldoorn, Alessandro Chiarotto, Rob J.E.M. Smeets, Raymond WJG Ostelo, Jaime Guzman, Maurits W van Tulder

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is responsible for considerable personal suffering worldwide. Those with persistent disabling symptoms also contribute to substantial costs to society via healthcare expenditure and reduced work productivity. While there are many treatment options, none are universally endorsed. The idea that chronic LBP is a condition best understood with reference to an interaction of physical, psychological and social influences, the 'biopsychosocial model', has received increasing acceptance. This has led to the development of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation (MBR) programs that target factors from the different domains, administered by healthcare professionals from different backgrounds.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 778 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 762 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 163 21%
Student > Bachelor 125 16%
Researcher 79 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 10%
Student > Postgraduate 52 7%
Other 168 22%
Unknown 114 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 248 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 145 19%
Psychology 90 12%
Sports and Recreations 31 4%
Social Sciences 27 3%
Other 90 12%
Unknown 147 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 439. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#34,570
of 17,609,679 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#74
of 11,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#349
of 208,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,609,679 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.