Report for: Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain

Title	Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain
Published in	Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI	10.1002/14651858.cd000963.pub3
Pubmed ID	25180773
Authors	Steven J Kamper, Andreas T Apeldoorn, Alessandro Chiarotto, Rob J.E.M. Smeets, Raymond WJG Ostelo, Jaime Guzman, Maurits W van Tulder
Abstract	Low back pain (LBP) is responsible for considerable personal suffering worldwide. Those with persistent disabling symptoms also contribute to substantial costs to society via healthcare expenditure and reduced work productivity. While there are many treatment options, none are universally endorsed. The idea that chronic LBP is a condition best understood with reference to an interaction of physical, psychological and social influences, the 'biopsychosocial model', has received increasing acceptance. This has led to the development of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation (MBR) programs that target factors from the different domains, administered by healthcare professionals from different backgrounds.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Saudi Arabia	17	22%
United Kingdom	13	17%
United States	6	8%
Spain	5	6%
Australia	4	5%
Netherlands	3	4%
Ireland	1	1%
India	1	1%
Italy	1	1%
Other	6	8%
Unknown	21	27%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	57	73%
Scientists	14	18%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	5	6%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	2	3%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 778 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Spain	2	<1%
Denmark	2	<1%
United Kingdom	2	<1%
Norway	2	<1%
Australia	1	<1%
France	1	<1%
Brazil	1	<1%
Netherlands	1	<1%
Canada	1	<1%
Other	3	<1%
Unknown	762	98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Master	163	21%
Student > Bachelor	125	16%
Researcher	79	10%
Student > Ph. D. Student	77	10%
Student > Postgraduate	52	7%
Other	168	22%
Unknown	114	15%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	248	32%
Nursing and Health Professions	145	19%
Psychology	90	12%
Sports and Recreations	31	4%
Social Sciences	27	3%
Other	90	12%
Unknown	147	19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 439. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.

All research outputs

#34,570

of 17,609,679 outputs

Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#74

of 11,723 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#349

of 208,666 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

of 225 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 17,609,679 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 11,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context