↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
392 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
914 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000963.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven J Kamper, Andreas T Apeldoorn, Alessandro Chiarotto, Rob J.E.M. Smeets, Raymond WJG Ostelo, Jaime Guzman, Maurits W van Tulder

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is responsible for considerable personal suffering worldwide. Those with persistent disabling symptoms also contribute to substantial costs to society via healthcare expenditure and reduced work productivity. While there are many treatment options, none are universally endorsed. The idea that chronic LBP is a condition best understood with reference to an interaction of physical, psychological and social influences, the 'biopsychosocial model', has received increasing acceptance. This has led to the development of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation (MBR) programs that target factors from the different domains, administered by healthcare professionals from different backgrounds.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 914 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 898 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 177 19%
Student > Bachelor 144 16%
Researcher 90 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 10%
Other 56 6%
Other 184 20%
Unknown 175 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 267 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 167 18%
Psychology 96 11%
Sports and Recreations 36 4%
Social Sciences 31 3%
Other 105 11%
Unknown 212 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 438. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#47,918
of 21,798,458 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#87
of 12,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#397
of 216,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,798,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.