↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Zinc supplements for preventing otitis media

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
Title
Zinc supplements for preventing otitis media
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006639.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anjana Gulani, Harshpal S Sachdev

Abstract

Otitis media is inflammation of the middle ear and is usually caused by infection. It affects people of all ages but is particularly common in young children. Around 164 million people worldwide have long-term hearing loss caused by this condition, 90% of them in low-income countries. As zinc supplements prevent pneumonia in disadvantaged children, we wanted to investigate whether zinc supplements could also prevent otitis media.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 246 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 17%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 43 17%
Unknown 77 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 13%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 3%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 88 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,160,486
of 26,233,885 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,390
of 13,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,519
of 242,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,233,885 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.